There is no doubt, as is clear after reading this volume, that the young telegraphers of the U.S. Conversely, the Confederate States of America never commissioned a telegraph branch of its military forces. Harlow pens an interesting account of the tension between this new branch of the military and the Signal Corps.
Military Telegraph Bureau that was for all intents and purposes a civilian organization under the control of the War Department. This was quickly remedied by commissioning a U.S. In the volume, the author recounts how the United States government was underequipped to handle this new form of technology at the beginning stages of the war. At that point in time, telegraphic services were operated through commercial telegraph companies. As with computers today, some of the most proficient operators of the telegraph during the war were youth. Morris than boy’s fingers began to itch for the feel of the brass” of the instrumentation that for the first time in history transmitted great quantities of information through wires.
“No sooner was the first telegraph wire put into service by Samuel P. “It had been clear enough back in 1861 that the electric telegraph was going to revolutionize military communications in this war.” The extent to which the telegraph served both the civic and military authorities made this medium of communication for the Civil War period what the internet is for today’s “information age.” One of the major technological advancements of the pre-Civil War era that had a profound effect upon the conflagration was the telegraph. The Americans who experienced the Civil War also lived during a time of profound technological advancement and metamorphosis. In our era, citizens increasingly gather information from the nascent technological medium known as the internet. The other book that is the subject of this review is Brass-Pounders: Young Telegraphers of the Civil War. Moreover, one need search no farther than the same exact event to ascertain how communication technology both formed and shaped the experiences of men in connection with the second impeachment of a President in American history. One need search no farther than the impeachment of President Clinton to find a “real world” example of the idea touched upon in this work of literature. This topic is the most interesting aspect of the book. Shaara utilizes the dangerous discretion inherent in historical fiction to set forth how the Confederates viewed The Civil War as a conflagration for the survival of their unique and “superior” culture, whereas, those who fought for the United States viewed the Civil War as a conflagration for the survival of the grand Union that dated to the signing of the Declaration of Independence. This reviewer recommends Gods and Generals, because it touches on how similar events can have dissimilar interpretations. The only concern I had about the volume was the degree to which it was a historical work or a fictional novel.
In accounting both historical nonfiction and fiction, the author touches upon such events as John Brown’s raid on the United States arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Brown’s execution for treason following the raid, and such battles as Chancellorsville. In the volume, the reader follows both what actually happened at the time as well as what the author imaginatively pens the various parties might have thought and said while experiencing the events in question. Featured are such prominent characters as Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, Robert E. In Gods and Generals, Shaara utilizes historically factual material to compose a work that examines the lives of a handful of notable Civil War leaders from 1858 to the summer of 1863 when the Battle of Gettysburg occurs. Both books are well written and both blur the threshold between historical fiction and nonfiction. The second book is Brass-Pounders: Young Telegraphers of the Civil War, written by Alvin F. The first book is Gods and Generals, written by Jeff Shaara, who is the son of Michael Shaara, author of the award-winning The Killer Angels. There are two books that I would like to introduce to the Roundtable which touch on the issue of the dissimilarity of similar experiences and how technology forms and communicates it. This is especially true during the time of the Civil War. It is interesting how no two men view a similar experience in the exact same way and how technology exists as an underlying force that helps to both form and communicate the experiences of men. Editor’s note: This article was originally published in The Charger in the spring of 2000.
0 kommentar(er)
